翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Jordan–Chevalley decomposition ・ Jordan–European Union relations ・ Jordan–Hare Stadium ・ Jordan–Israel Mixed Armistice Commission ・ Jordan–Kenya relations ・ Jordan–Malaysia relations ・ Jordan–Pakistan relations ・ Jordan–Russia relations ・ Jordan–Saudi Arabia relations ・ Jordan–Schur theorem ・ Jordan–Syria border ・ Jordan–Syria relations ・ Jordan–United Arab Emirates relations ・ Jordan–United States Free Trade Agreement ・ Jordan–United States relations ・ Jordan–Wigner transformation ・ Jordao Pattinama ・ Jordavi ・ Jordberga Castle ・ Jordbro ・ Jordbro Grave Field ・ Jordbruksaktuellt ・ Jorden ・ Jorden Hall ・ Jorden runt på 6 steg ・ Jorden, Texas ・ Jordens herrar ・ Jordens Peters ・ Jordensia ・ Jordi Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Jordan–Wigner transformation ： ウィキペディア英語版 Jordan–Wigner transformation The Jordan–Wigner transformation is a transformation that maps spin operators onto fermionic creation and annihilation operators. It was proposed by Pascual Jordan and Eugene Wigner for one-dimensional lattice models, but now two-dimensional analogues of the transformation have also been created. The Jordan–Wigner transformation is often used to exactly solve 1D spin-chains such as the Ising and XY models by transforming the spin operators to fermionic operators and then diagonalizing in the fermionic basis. This transformation actually shows that the distinction between spin-1/2 particles and fermions is nonexistent. It can be applied to systems with an arbitrary dimension. ==Analogy between spins and fermions== In what follows we will show how to map a 1D spin chain of spin-1/2 particles to fermions. Take spin-1/2 Pauli operators acting on a site $j$ of a 1D chain, $\backslash sigma\_^,\; \backslash sigma\_^,\; \backslash sigma\_^$. Taking the anticommutator of $\backslash sigma\_^$ and $\backslash sigma\_^$, we find $\backslash ,\backslash sigma\_^\backslash \}\; =\; 1$, as would be expected from fermionic creation and annihilation operators. We might then be tempted to set :$\backslash sigma\_^\; =(\; \backslash sigma\_^+i\backslash sigma\_^)/2\; =\; f\_^$ :$\backslash sigma\_^\; =\; (\backslash sigma\_^-i\backslash sigma\_^\; )/2=\; f\_$ :$\backslash sigma\_^\; =\; 2f\_j^f\_j\; -\; 1.$ Now, we have the correct same-site fermionic relations $\backslash ,\; f\_\backslash \}=1$, however, on different sites, we have the relation $()\; =\; 0$, where $j\; \backslash neq\; k$, and so spins on different sites commute unlike fermions which anti-commute. We must remedy this before we can take the analogy very seriously. A transformation which recovers the true fermion commutation relations from spin-operators was performed in 1928 by Jordan and Wigner. This is a special example of a Klein transformation. We take a chain of fermions, and define a new set of operators :$a\_^\; =\; e^f^\_k\; f\_k\}\; \backslash cdot\; f^\_j$ :$a\_\; =\; e^f^\_k\; f\_k\}\; \backslash cdot\; f\_j$ :$a\_j^\; a\_j\; -\; \backslash frac\; =\; f^\_j\; f\_j\; -\; \backslash frac.$ They differ from the above only by a phase $e^f^\_k\; f\_k\}$. The phase is determined by the number of occupied fermionic modes in modes $k=1,\backslash ldots,j-1$ of the field. The phase is equal to $+1$ if the number of occupied modes is even, and $-1$ if the number of occupied modes is odd. This phase is often expressed as :$e^f^\_k\; f\_k\}=\backslash prod\_^e^=\backslash prod\_^(1-2f^\_k\; f\_k).$ Where the last equality makes use of the fact that $f^\_k\; f\_k\backslash in\backslash .$ The transformed spin operators now have the appropriate fermionic commutation relations :$\backslash =\backslash delta\_,\; \backslash ,\; \backslash =0,\; \backslash ,\; \backslash =0.$ The inverse transformation is given by :$a^\_j\; =\; e^a^\_k\; a\_k\}\; \backslash cdot\; \backslash sigma\_j^+$ :$a\_j\; =\; e^a^\_k\; a\_k\}\; \backslash cdot\; \backslash sigma\_j^-$ :$a^\backslash dagger\_j\; a\_j\; =\; \backslash sigma\_j^z+\backslash frac.$ Note that the definition of the fermionic operators is nonlocal with respect to the bosonic operators because we have to deal with an entire chain of operators to the left of the site the fermionic operators are defined with respect to. This is also true the other way around. This is an example of a 't Hooft operator, which is a disorder operator instead of an order operator. This is also an example of an S-duality. If the system has more than one dimension the transformation can still be applied. It is only necessary to label the sites in an arbitrary way by a single index. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Jordan–Wigner transformation」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.